WCAG 2.1 AA Services to us
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.1 AA) covers a wide range of recommendations for making Web content more accessible. Following these guidelines will make content more accessible to a wider range of people with disabilities, including accommodations for blindness and low vision, deafness and hearing loss, limited movement, speech disabilities, photosensitivity, and combinations of these, and some accommodation for learning disabilities and cognitive limitations; but will not address every user need for people with these disabilities. These guidelines address accessibility of web content on desktops, laptops, tablets, and mobile devices. Following these guidelines will also often make Web content more usable to users in general.
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.1 AA) defines how to make Web content more accessible to people with disabilities. Accessibility involves a wide range of disabilities, including visual, auditory, physical, speech, cognitive, language, learning, and neurological disabilities.
This ultimate WCAG 2.1 AA provides a simplified explanation of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) and the most important accessibility requirements that website owners, designers, developers, product managers, and organizations need to follow. By using this checklist, users can easily refer to the key points and ensure that their digital products and services comply with accessibility standards, thereby improving the user experience for all visitors, including those with disabilities, and reducing the risk of legal liabilities.
WCAG 2.1 AA consists of a set of technology independent guidelines and success criteria to help make web content accessible to, and usable by, persons with disabilities. They provide advice to web content authors, designers and developers on ensuring that the resources they produce are as accessible as possible to as many people as possible, regardless of any disability they have; for example, visual impairment, hearing loss, learning difficulties, age related limitations, amongst others.
![images](assets/images/about/508.png)
![images](assets/images/choose/3.png)
For example, describing an image (or any other non-text content) by using the alt attribute in HTML greatly benefits people who are blind or partially sighted. The textual description in the alt attribute can either be converted into speech output or transmitted to electronic refreshable braille displays.
Additionally, WCAG 2.1 AA can result in advantages for other beneficiaries, including people who may be considered situationally disabled. People who, because of circumstances such as browsing technology, network connection speed or browsing environment, may experience barriers similar to people with disabilities.
Using Adobe Experience Manager, content authors and/or website owners can create web content that meets relevant WCAG 2.1 AA Level A and Level AA success criteria.
Therefore, understanding the aims of WCAG 2.1 AA and how the guidelines are structured is an important part of understanding web accessibility and how the guidelines can help in creating accessible web content.
The intention of WCAG 2.1 AA is to provide guidelines that:
Are technology-agnostic:
In other words, guidelines that can be applied to a range of web content formats, not just HTML. So WCAG 2.1 AA can cover content generated by or provided in PDF, Flash, JavaScript and other current and future web technologies.
Are testable:
Each guideline is written in such a way that it can be objectively tested to ensure that a group of accessibility experts would generally agree that the guideline has been met. One of the challenges of accessibility guidelines is that while some can be technically testable, others require human judgment to ascertain whether or not the guideline has been successfully met.
Support prioritized and contextual implementation:
WCAG 2.1 AA guidelines are given priorities, relating to the likely impact of not following a guideline on a particular group of users with disabilities. This allows authors to make an informed decision on the most important guidelines for their particular situation. In addition, the concept of accessibility supported is introduced. This allows authors to make decisions on how best to use web technologies that may not have full accessibility support, or may require users to have specific assistive technologies and/or browsers in order to benefit from accessibility features.